Abstract
1. Patient positioning and preparation of portals |
a. Supine position with knee flexion more than 90° for free dangling of the affected knee |
b. Anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, posterolateral, and trans-septal portals |
2. Graft preparation |
a. Tibialis anterior or posterior allograft tendon |
b. Whip-stitched at both ends using no. 5 Ethibond suture |
c. Two equal strands using the loop of the TightRope RT |
3. Tibial tunnel formation |
a. Transtibial technique with 55° of tibial PCL guide |
b. Targeting toward the PCL fossa and lateral portion of the PCL stump |
4. Femoral tunnel formation |
a. Outside-in retro-socket technique using FlipCutter |
b. 60° of femoral PCL guide |
c. Debridement of PCL remnants for easy graft passage after creation of femoral tunnel |
5. Graft passage and fixation |
a. Using the looped wire for graft passage |
b. Graft passage with caudo-cranial direction from the tibial tunnel to the femoral tunnel |
c. Advancement of graft by pulling the tensioning strands in the same direction of graft passage |
d. Tibial fixation using bio-absorbable interference screw, metal screw, and spike washer with anterior drawer force |
Advantages |
1. It is possible to create a retrograde femoral socket in the outside-in manner in a desirable direction. |
2. This technique creates less graft angulation on the entry area of the femoral tunnel. |
3. This method helps avoid violation of the vastus medialis oblique muscle with the drill. |
4. Suspensory fixation is possible using a button. |
Disadvantages |
1. It is difficult to use the autograft because of the need for a relatively long graft, as the usual disadvantage of transtibial techniques. |
2. Posterior arthroscopy including making a trans-septal portal is a technically demanding procedure, which is the usual disadvantage of transtibial techniques. |
Tips and Pearls |
Trans-septal portal for direct visualization of the PCL stump |
55° of the tibial drill guide for producing oblique tibial tunnel |
>70° of knee flexion for protecting the posterior neurovascular structures |
The adequate exposure of the posterior tibia for optimal tibial tunnel |
Penetration of the posterior tibial cortex in a controlled manner under direct visualization of the arthroscope |
Using the looped wire for easy graft passage |
Pitfalls |
The possibility of the killer turn observed in transtibial techniques for the tibial tunnel |
Suturing both ends of the tendon smoothly and nondistended for preventing the catching of the graft during the intra-articular passage |
PCL Reconstruction Technique








Discussion
- Stener S.
- Ejerhed L.
- Sernert N.
- Laxdal G.
- Rostgard-Christensen L.
- Kartus J.
Supplementary Data
- Video 1
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with retrograde femoral technique, posterior trans-septal portal, and full tibial tunnel. The right knee is shown in supine position with the knee flexed to 90°. When the PCL was ruptured, the ACL appeared pseudo-lax and tightened during an anterior drawer test of the tibia. After making the posteromedial portal, a posterolateral portal was made using a switching stick inserted into the posteromedial portal to posterolateral compartment with the penetration of the posterior septum and established on the palpable point of the switching stick. A trans-septal portal was made by connecting the posteromedial and posterolateral portal. Once the posteromedial and posterolateral portals were established, PCL remnants were debrided from the tibial and femoral footprint. The guide pin was targeted toward the lateral portion of the PCL stump. The tibial tunnel was made using a reamer. A twisted wire was then passed through the tibial tunnel, and it brought out the anteromedial portal to pass the PCL graft easily. The femoral tunnel was created using an out-side in, retro-socket technique. The tip of the guide hook was targeted at the central portion of the footprint of the PCL remnant. After the tip of the FlipCutter was inserted in the joint space, the femoral guide was removed from the anteromedial portal and the drill sleeve was pushed into the bone lightly. The blue hub was pushed forward to flip the blade into cutting position. The socket was formed at least 30 mm deep with clockwise drilling. The FlipCutter was removed by straightening the blade. The looped wire used for graft passage was inserted through the drill sleeve and picked out to the anteromedial portal. PCL remnants were debrided from the femoral footprint for easy graft passage (PCL 30). The femoral socket was safely made without complications (PCL 21), and the walls of the tunnel were smooth and consistent. The graft passage was done stage by stage. The prepared graft was first passed into the knee joint through the tibial tunnel using twisted wire under direct arthroscopic vision in the anterolateral portal. Next, the tendon portion of the graft was passed into the femoral tunnel by the aid of a femoral wire shuttle. The TightRope button should be directly visualized to pass the femoral socket fluently. The graft was advanced by pulling the tensioning strands in the same direction of graft advancement using the TightRope RT. The graft was tensioned and fixed on the tibial side with bioabsorbable interference screws, and the free ends of the graft were fixed with a spiked washer and a screw under manual tension. Final tensioning of the grafted PCL was performed. (ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament.)
References
- Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 1491-1498
- A new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Minimization of graft angulation.Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 258-263
- Description of a new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and comparison with a 2-incision technique.Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 825-832
- The graft/tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel placement.Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 711-714
- All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: Second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 717-727
- Posterior portals for arthroscopic surgery of the knee.Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 608-613
- Direct posterior-posterior triangulation of the knee joint.Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 262-264
- Posterior trans-septal portal for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint.Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 774-779
- Tibial tunnel aperture location during single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of tibial guide positions.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 874-881
- Comparison of tibial tunnel techniques in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: C-arm versus anatomic fovea landmark.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 487-492
- Complications of posterior cruciate ligament surgery.Sports Med Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 269-274
- The graft/femoral tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of 3 techniques for femoral tunnel placement.J Knee Surg. 2009; 22: 106-110
- Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11: 297-306
- Does retrograde tibial tunnel drilling decrease subchondral bone lesions during ACL reconstruction? A prospective trial comparing retrograde to antegrade technique.Knee. 2016; 23: 111-115
- A long-term, prospective, randomized study comparing biodegradable and metal interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: Radiographic results and clinical outcome.Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 1598-1605
- Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16: 1108-1113
- Suspensory fixation of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical comparison of 3 implants.Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 767-776
- Cortical suspensory button versus aperture interference screw fixation for knee anterior cruciate ligament soft-tissue allograft: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1733-1739
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy