If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Address correspondence to Brian J. Rebolledo, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Scripps Clinic, 10666 N. Torrey Pines, Rd., MS-116, La Jolla, CA, 92037, U.S.A.
Capsular management during hip arthroscopy represents an important component to access, visualization, and restoration of hip stability. In the setting of femoroacetabular impingement, the peripheral compartment represents access to the femoral neck where abnormal morphology is commonly addressed with arthroscopic femoroplasty. While various techniques have been described for peripheral compartment visualization, difficulty can arise in creating a wide display of the femoral neck while minimizing subsequent impairment of the capsule. In order to obtain an unobstructed view of the femoral neck, the hip capsule must be managed skillfully. The use of hip flexion to relax the capsule for visualization of the peripheral compartment is a nearly universal practice for hip surgeons. However, differences in management of the capsule have previously included traction sutures and further capsulotomies. In this technical note, we describe our Pull String method for peripheral compartment access using an interportal capsulotomy with strategic traction suture placement and choreography of suture tensioning. This enables full view of the femoral neck for successful femoroplasty, while still allowing for complete capsule repair to help restore stability.
Surgical technique for capsular suspension and strategic suture tensioning during hip arthroscopy to improve visualization during arthroscopic femoroplasty.
Technique Video
See video under supplementary data.
Introduction
The role of hip arthroscopy in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is widely adopted as a minimally invasive approach for treatment. Symptomatic FAI has been associated with early chondrolabral degeneration and poses significant risk for the patient to develop subsequent osteoarthritis.
In being able to address the associated pathology of FAI, both central and peripheral compartment access is necessary. Adequate visualization within both compartments starts with initial access to the hip and subsequent management of the hip capsule. The hip capsule has been found to play a major role in hip joint stability,
although preferences for capsular management during hip arthroscopy vary between surgeons. Without proper management of the hip capsule, postoperative instability following hip arthroscopy may occur, leading to increased revision surgery.
Therefore, capsular management throughout the entire surgery is crucial for success, from the initial capsulotomy to capsule closure.
Capsulotomy is performed during hip arthroscopy to allow for intraoperative visualization, with interportal capsulotomy being the most common approach used by surgeons.
This is often due to poor intraoperative visualization and access to the cam deformity. To avoid these scenarios, some surgeons have used a T-capsulotomy or limited capsulectomy to offer a better view of the affected cam lesion. However, further manipulation of the capsule can lend to impaired functional impact if incomplete repair occurs. These concerns may be heightened in patients with a diagnosis of hip instability or borderline dysplasia. In contrast, techniques that aim to minimize or even eliminate hip capsulotomy can be hindered by restricted view of larger cam deformities.
Similar to conventional open surgery, manual retraction and soft tissue tension must be anticipated to provide optimal view of the field. Using a similar mindset, capsular suspension and directional tension of the capsule should be considered to provide optimal views during arthroscopic femoroplasty. The purpose of the Pull String method is to detail the steps of capsular suspension and choreography of suture tensioning to optimize visualization during peripheral compartment access. This allows for improved visibility of the cam deformity with an interportal capsulotomy, while allowing for subsequent capsular repair.
Surgical Technique
A standard supine hip arthroscopy set-up is used for the procedure. A post-less traction table (Guardian; Stryker, Kalamazoo, IN) is routinely used and positioned at approximately 10-15° of Trendelenburg position to help facilitate adequate traction of the hip for central compartment access. During the procedure, three portals are created: standard anterolateral (AL) portal, mid-anterior portal (MAP), and distal anterolateral (DALA) portal (Fig 1, Video 1).
Fig 1Standard supine hip arthroscopy set-up with the use of three portals; anterolateral (AL), mid-anterior (MAP), and distal anterolateral (DALA).
Initial access is via the central compartment after traction of the hip is achieved. An interportal capsulotomy is then created between the AL and MAP, allowing for access and visualization throughout the case. The performed capsulotomy divides the hip capsule into acetabular side (superior) and femoral side (inferior) leaflets (Fig 2). All necessary procedures within the central compartment are performed first. Notably, labral repair or reconstruction is customarily performed in the central compartment and will involve an 8-mm cannula being placed through the DALA portal for anchor placement. This cannula will be left in place until traction sutures are placed during peripheral compartment procedures. Traction sutures are occasionally used in the acetabular side of the capsule while performing procedures within the central compartment, although it is not necessary for this described method within the peripheral compartment.
Fig 2The interportal capsulotomy creates a superior acetabular leaflet (yellow arrow) and inferior femoral leaflet (blue arrow). This represents visualization of the capsule prior to retraction from the anterolateral portal.
Once all procedures within the central compartment are completed, traction of the hip is released. Boot straps are also loosened at this time to take undue pressure off the patient’s feet. The hip is then flexed to ∼30-40° of flexion in neutral rotation. This helps relax the femoral side of the capsule. If there is significant tissue adherence between the gluteus minimus and iliocapsularis overlying the femoral capsule, a shaver or electrocautery will be used to gently clear the anterior capsule to improve capsular mobility.
At this point, a 70° slingshot suture passer (Pivot Slingshot; Stryker) is used to pass a #2 nonabsorbable suture through the DALA portal cannula. The steep angle from the DALA portal allows for distal penetration of the femoral side capsule, followed by deployment of the suture within the capsulotomy window. This suture end is then retrieved out of the DALA portal. A total of 2-3 traction sutures are placed through the DALA portal, starting from the medial aspect of the capsulotomy and extending laterally/posteriorly. Once traction sutures have been placed, the cannula is removed, and the traction sutures are tensioned against the skin with a clamp (Fig 3).
Fig 3Traction sutures are tensioned from the distal anterolateral portal portal.This represents a view of the distal femoral neck for access during corrective femoroplasty.
Next a switching stick is placed in the AL portal, and the camera is moved to the MAP. A 5.5-mm slotted cannula is placed over the switching stick. The switching stick is removed, and the slingshot suture passer is placed on the slotted cannula through the AL portal. The slingshot is then used to penetrate the far posterior aspect of the femoral capsule and deploy a traction suture that is subsequently retrieved through the AL portal. The camera is switched back to the AL portal, and the traction suture from the AL portal is tensioned to the skin. In scenarios of a large posterior cam deformity, an additional far posterior traction suture can be placed through the AL portal.
Suture Tension Choreography for Visualization During Femoroplasty
While performing femoroplasty, exposure of the femoral neck can be optimized through strategic tensioning of the traction sutures. Distal access of the femoral neck is achieved by tensioning the DALA sutures, while leaving some slack in the AL traction suture. However, to access the lateral femoral neck, the leg is brought into extension with slight internal rotation. This can tension the posterior/lateral capsule; therefore, the DALA traction sutures are loosened and the AL portal traction suture is tightly tensioned to the skin to view the posterior extent of the cam deformity. In performing the femoroplasty, we will initially start with visualizing from the AL portal and use a 5.5-mm bur from the MAP. However, once the leg is extended, we will switch the camera to the MAP and the 5.5-mm bur to the AL portal for access to the posterior cam deformity and completion of the femoroplasty.
the interportal capsulotomy is consistently closed for each case using 4-5 nonabsorbable sutures in a simple or figure-of-8 configuration to provide adequate tensile strength to the repair (Fig 4).
Fig 4Sutures placed for closure of the interportal capsulotomy following femoroplasty. This ensures that stability can be restored with complete closure of the femoral capsule following traction suture manipulation.
The incidence of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral pathology increased by 85% between 2011 and 2018 in the United States.
The treatment of FAI is the most common indication for hip arthroscopy, which often requires treatment for central compartment and peripheral compartment pathology. In the setting of failed hip arthroscopy, incomplete femoroplasty is the most common cause.
This can be due to poor visualization in the peripheral compartment, given the proximity of the capsule overlying the femoral neck. Therefore, skillful management of the capsule is necessary to visualize and address the cam deformity present. The parallel concern is the preservation of the hip capsule throughout the procedure to allow for subsequent repair.
Access to the hip is most commonly achieved by interportal capsulotomy to allow for intraoperative visualization.
Furthermore, improved outcomes have been seen with complete capsule repair compared to partial capsule repair for patients undergoing T-capsulotomy for FAI.
Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement.
Patients who undergo repair of capsulotomy have reported improved Hip Outcome Daily Living (HOS-ADL) scores, as well as modified Harris hip scores (mHHs), when compared to patients where the capsule is not repaired.
Midterm outcomes following repair of capsulotomy versus nonrepair in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with labral repair.
Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement.
Midterm outcomes following repair of capsulotomy versus nonrepair in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with labral repair.
This technique has the advantage of being able to effectively increase visibility of the cam deformity to allow for easier resection of the cam deformity present (Table 1). While traction sutures for capsular suspension have been described prior, this represents a novel technique to provide guidance on suture placement and tensioning to optimize visualization through an interportal capsulotomy. While improved visibility can also be achieved with a T-capsulotomy, further insult to the iliofemoral ligament raises concerns for those with hip instability considerations.
Table 1Technique Pearls and Pitfalls
Pearls
Pitfalls
•
Remove adhesions overlying the anterior femoral capsule to improve mobility during retraction.
•
A minimum of 2-3 traction sutures should be used through the DALA portal with at least one placed laterally through the AL portal.
•
Leave the DALA portal cannula in during suture placement to allow for easier retrieval.
•
Removing periosteum of the cam deformity with electrocautery prior to femoroplasty will also help release any undersurface adhesions.
•
Traction sutures placed close together will provide suspension in a limited vector.
•
Suture passers that do not allow for distal penetration of the capsule will provide limited capsular retraction.
•
Traction suture placement can transiently increase operative time until efficient placement can occur.
There are potential limitations to this technique. Traction suture placement can increase operative time initially; however, once efficiency is achieved, this time is often negligible. While cam resection is performed with the use of a bur under direct visualization with the Pull String method, we still use intraoperative fluoroscopy to ensure appropriate resection is completed.
Conclusions
We have described our surgical technique for capsular suspension and traction suture tension choreography to optimize access for arthroscopic femoroplasty. The technique serves as an effective method to manage the hip capsule during femoroplasty, while preserving the integrity of the capsule for subsequent repair.
Surgical technique for capsular suspension and strategic suture tensioning during hip arthroscopy to improve visualization during arthroscopic femoroplasty.
References
Ito K.
Minka 2nd, M.A.
Leunig M.
Werlen S.
Ganz R.
Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset.
The incidence of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral pathology increased by 85% between 2011 and 2018 in the United States.
Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement.
Midterm outcomes following repair of capsulotomy versus nonrepair in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with labral repair.
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: B.J.R. reports being a board or committee member for the International Society of Arthroscopy and Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine; reports consulting fees for Stryker and Wright Medical Technology; speaker fees from DJO, and travel support from Stryker. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
00070-6&id=gr1.jpg){kind=link}
00070-6&id=gr2.jpg){kind=link}
00070-6&id=gr3.jpg){kind=link}
00070-6&id=gr4.jpg){kind=link}