Advertisement
Technical Note| Volume 12, ISSUE 2, e207-e215, February 2023

Latarjet Procedure to Restore Glenohumeral Stability in a Patient With a Postage Stamp Fracture

Open AccessPublished:January 18, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2022.10.010

      Abstract

      The “postage stamp fracture” is an anterior glenoid rim fracture following arthroscopic repair of a Bankart lesion. Often occurring at the time of an acute trauma, a fracture line propagates though the previous Bankart repair anchor sites, resulting in recurrent anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. The resultant glenoid rim fracture edge gives a similar appearance as the edge of a stamp, with the osseous edge having the classic “perforation” pattern. When patients present with a postage stamp fracture, even in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss, we believe that additional soft-tissue stabilization procedures and/or fracture fixation pose a significant risk of failure. In our opinion, a Latarjet procedure is recommended in a majority of patients with a postage stamp fracture for restoration of glenohumeral stability. The procedure offers a reliable, reproducible surgical intervention that controls for many of the factors that can make arthroscopic revision unreliable, such as poor bone quality, adhesions, labral degeneration, and bone loss. Here, we outline our preferred surgical technique to restore glenohumeral stability using the Latarjet procedure for a patient with a postage stamp fracture.

      Technique Video

      See video under supplementary data.

      The “postage stamp fracture” is an anterior glenoid rim fracture following arthroscopic repair of a Bankart lesion.
      • Provencher M.T.
      • Sanchez A.
      • Sanchez G.
      • et al.
      Shoulder and elbow injuries in athletes: Prevention, treatment and return to sport.
      Often occurring at the time of an acute trauma, a fracture line propagates though the previous Bankart repair anchor sites, resulting in recurrent anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. The resultant glenoid rim fracture edge gives a similar appearance as the edge of a stamp, with the osseous edge having the classic “perforation” pattern.
      Risk factors associated with increased risk of a postage stamp fracture include younger age (<25 years old), involvement in a contact sport, use of >3 anchors at time of initial Bankart repair, presence of osteolysis at anchor sites in the anterior glenoid, and use of knotted suture anchors. These fractures often occur at a mean interval of 12 to 24 months following arthroscopic Bankart repair.
      • Woolnough T.
      • Shah A.
      • Sheean A.J.
      • Lesniak B.P.
      • Wong I.
      • Sa D.
      “Postage stamp” fractures: A systematic review of patient and suture anchor profiles causing anterior glenoid rim fractures after Bankart repair.
      Osseous deficiency has been increasingly recognized as a major risk factor for glenohumeral instability. Initial cadaveric studies of glenohumeral stability suggested that glenoid width bone loss of 19% to 21% significantly compromised soft-tissue repairs.
      • Itoi E.
      • Lee S.B.
      • Berglund L.J.
      • Berge L.L.
      • An K.N.
      The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: A cadaveric study.
      ,
      • Yamamoto N.
      • Muraki T.
      • Sperling J.W.
      Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect.
      As we have gained a better understanding of how the glenoid surface area influences glenohumeral stability, we now know that smaller amounts of bone loss, often termed as “subcritical” bone loss can and often are associated with poorer outcomes following soft-tissue–based procedures.
      • Shaha J.S.
      • Cook J.B.
      • Song D.J.
      Redefining “critical” bone loss in shoulder instability: Functional outcomes worsen with “subcritical” bone loss.

      Patient Evaluation

      Patient evaluation in the clinical setting should begin with a thorough history, specifically noting previous surgical history and timing, location of surgical incision, the timing of return of instability and trauma associated with this return, amount of instability events, nocturnal instability, pain, position of maximum instability, and a complete neurovascular examination of the upper extremity.

      Imaging

      Office imaging should begin with standard radiographs, including anteroposterior, scapular-Y, axillary, and West Point view. Once glenoid insufficiency is confirmed on radiographs (Fig 1), advanced imaging is recommended. We prefer using both magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in these patients to assess the labral and chondral integrity as well as more precisely assessing location and size of glenoid rim fracture (Fig 2), respectively.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig 1Clinical radiographs of a patient with recurrent shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair. West point view of the right shoulder reveals anterior glenoid bone loss (solid line), a medialized bone fragment anterior to the glenoid (dotted line), and posterior impaction injury of the humeral head (∗).
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Fig 2Sagittal cuts of a CT scan of a right shoulder in a patient with recurrent anterior instability reveal a glenoid rim fracture propagating through the location of previous suture anchor tunnels. This fracture fragment is called a “postage stamp” fracture as the result of the perforated appearance of the fracture edge, which is similar to that of a stamp edge (red line). (CT, computed tomography.)

      Indications

      A patient should be considered for a bony anterior stabilization procedure in the setting of a postage stamp fracture in nearly all settings. Factors that may push a surgeon to consider bony stabilization include younger age of the patient, amount of dislocation time, sex, and time from fracture until evaluation. In a situation in which the patient has greater than 15% bone loss, especially in the setting of recurrence, we strongly recommend this surgical procedure. In addition, although glenoid fragment open reduction and fixation can be considered, the timing of this procedure and bone quality often make a fixation procedure less likely to be successful in patients with previous glenoid surgery. In our experience, if we are not able to directly fix this fracture within the first 10 days, the bone quality will not allow for stable fixation. Also, in our experience, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging often overestimate the quality of bone and should be viewed with caution when choosing between fracture repair versus other bony stabilization procedure. Finally, previous instrumentation and anchor placement into the anterior glenoid often lead to osteolysis around anchors and resultant decrease in osseous integrity.
      In patients who present with postage stamp fractures, even in the setting of subcritical bone loss, we feel that additional soft-tissue stabilization procedures and/or fracture repair pose a significant risk of failure. When considering patients for a Latarjet procedure, it is critical that the surgeon have a clear understanding of the risks of this surgical technique as well as the indications and contraindications.
      • Domos P.
      • Lunini E.
      • Walch G.
      Contraindications and complications of the Latarjet procedure.
      These are outlined in Table 1.
      Table 1Indications, Contraindications, and Risks of the Latarjet Procedure for Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With Postage Stamp Fracture
      Indications
       Recurrent anterior instability
       Glenoid bone loss greater than 15%
       Glenoid bone loss less than 15% with
      • Concurrent Hill–Sachs lesion or
      • Subacute/chronic fracture fragment or
      • Osteolysis near rim fracture or
      • High-consequence profession (mountain climber, firefighter, police officer, etc.)
      Contraindications
       Patients 50 years or older with irreparable rotator cuff tear (6)
       Voluntary anterior dislocators/subluxators (6)
       Uncontrolled epilepsy (6)
       Posterior inferior instability (6)
      Risks
       Hematoma formation
       Recurrence of instability
       Infection
       Loss of external rotation
       Bone block nonunion, fracture, resorption

      Surgical Technique (With Video Illustration)

      Positioning

      We recommend placing the patient in standard beach-chair position. Adjusting the table into a small amount of reverse Trendelenburg positioning assists with exposure and instrumentation of the inferior glenoid. In addition, bolstering the medial scapular border with nonsterile towels can aid in scapular protraction and visualization. When draping, ensure that draping extends medially to the sternoclavicular joint.

      Examination Under Anesthesia (EUA)

      EUA allows the surgeon to qualify the instability without the patient guarding against the examination. It also allows the surgeon to determine whether the shoulder rests in a dislocated position and allows the surgeon to identify the point of maximum instability, which will be critical to incorporate into final coracoid positioning.

      Diagnostic Arthroscopy and Limited Debridement

      A standard posterior arthroscopic portal should be used to view the intra-articular pathology. We prefer to use a 5-mm cannula in our anterior portal to assist with flow and make the portal in line with the planned open approach. The anterior glenoid should be thoroughly evaluated and probed, and bone quality should be recorded. In subacute fractures, the fragment often is encased in soft tissue and callus. A 70° arthroscope is helpful for visualization of a medialized anterior glenoid fragment. All previous anchors and sutures should be carefully debrided and removed (Fig 3). Concurrent intra-articular pathology also should be evaluated and addressed during this portion of the case or after coracoid transfer. Given the medial position of these fragments, we prefer maximizing fragment excision under direct arthroscopic visualization to minimize need for aggressive medial retraction. The anterior glenoid is also prepared initially under direct arthroscopic visualization at this time (Fig 4).
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Fig 3The anterior glenoid rim of the right shoulder is viewed from the posterior viewing portal. The postage stamp fracture (PSF) is outlined and found to be medially displaced with significant adhesions. The previous suture anchor can be visualized, still within the fragment (blue line). The anterior rim of the glenoid is marked with the red line.
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      Fig 4The anterior glenoid rim of the right shoulder is viewed from the posterior viewing portal. The postage stamp fracture has been removed and the anterior glenoid rim defect (D) is outlined in red.

      Coracoid Harvest and Preparation

      Our incision is made from the tip of the coracoid extending distally along the deltopectoral interval to the superior aspect of the axillary fold, in this case 7 cm. The incision is taken down to the clavipectoral fascia to create full-thickness flaps with the Bovie for hemostasis. The fascia is incised with Metzenbaum's along with the deltopectoral interval and bluntly dissected between the deltoid and pectoralis. The cephalic vein is dissected laterally to minimize transection of bridging veins and risk of hematoma formation. Subpectoral dissection is performed with a Cobb and curved Mayos. A Kolbel retractor is placed between the deltoid and pectoralis major. The red–white stripe of the short head of the biceps and conjoined tendon is identified and the fascia just lateral to the red stripe is incised. Finger dissection is then used to free the posterior adhesions deep to the conjoined. The coracoacromial ligament is then released, leaving a 1-cm cuff of tissue attached to the coracoid for future incorporation into the repair. The coracoid is then exposed to its base, removing lateral and superior adhesions, while maintaining the coracoclavicular ligaments. The pectoralis minor is meticulously released directly off the medial coracoid. At this stage, care is taken to ensure that the trapezoidal ligament, which is 2 to 3 mm anterior to the elbow, is not released.
      • Shibata T.
      • Izaki T.
      • Miyake S.
      • et al.
      Predictors of safety margin for coracoid transfer: A cadaveric morphometric analysis.
      After the coracoid is skeletonized, the planned cut is measured and marked at approximately 25 mm from the tip of the coracoid. We prefer using a 90° sagittal saw from superior to inferior for a majority of the coracoid release, finishing the osteotomy with a 0.5-inch curved osteotome from superomedial to inferolateral.
      Following completion of the osseous cut, the coracoid is held at the level of the skin incision with a grasping forceps and the posterior insertion of the coracohumeral ligament is released. The musculocutaneous nerve is palpated, visualized, and gently released free of tension all the way to its insertion into the biceps muscle belly. During these steps, the surgeon should be very mindful of the tension placed on the coracoid to avoid a neural injury. We use a sagittal saw to lightly decorticate the coracoid and prepare the osseous bed for repair to the anterior glenoid. Using the drill guide clamp, 2 drill holes are provisionally drilled in the coracoid piece from the planned anterior surface to the planned deep surface. The coracoid is then tucked into the wound and retracted away for later retrieval.

      Glenoid Exposure and Preparation

      The arm is then externally rotated to place the subscapularis on tension. The superior and inferior borders of the subscapularis tendon are identified. The fibers of the subscapularis are then split at the 60/40 junction, extending from the lesser tuberosity laterally to the level of the glenoid medially. Mayo scissors are used to develop a plane between the subscapularis and anterior glenohumeral capsule. Gelpi retractors are placed in the subscapularis split and identified the anterior glenohumeral capsule. At the level of the glenoid, the capsular split is then extended straight inferiorly. The superomedial corner of the capsule of the inferior capsule is tagged for later identification during capsular repair. With a Bovie and Cobb elevator, the anteroinferior labrum is further dissected subperiosteally off the glenoid. The soft tissues are dissected off the anterior glenoid neck and remnant deep hardware removed. The fracture bed is prepared and contoured to accept the coracoid transfer (Fig 5).
      Figure thumbnail gr5
      Fig 5The right glenoid (G) is visualized through a deltopectoral approach. The bony defect (D) is outlined in white. Once the approach is complete, before coracoid fixation, the anterior rim is contoured and flattened. Callus and fibrous tissue are removed to improve bone to bone healing.

      Coracoid Transfer

      The coracoid is retrieved from within the wound and secured along the glenoid neck, flush with the glenoid laterally. The optimal position of the coracoid is confirmed using digital palpation and held in place with a K-wire (Fig 6). An additional K-wire is placed outside the planned screw trajectory, and drill holes are placed through the coracoid into the glenoid using a 3.5-mm drill. The 4.0 mm, fully threaded, noncannulated bicortical screws are then inserted with suture washers (Fig 7). In our case, a small step off is noted between the coracoid and the glenoid. This is contoured using a high-speed burr to smooth the lateral prominence of the coracoid graft.
      Figure thumbnail gr6
      Fig 6The right glenoid (G) is visualized through a deltopectoral approach. Following glenoid rim preparation, the coracoid (C) is positioned at the anterior inferior glenoid and provisionally held in place with K-wires. The K-wires are intentionally placed outside planned screw trajectory.
      Figure thumbnail gr7
      Fig 7The right glenoid (G) is visualized through a deltopectoral approach. Following provisional fixation, the coracoid (C), two 4.0-mm solid, fully threaded screws are placed through the graft, and into the glenoid with bicortical fixation. The screws are loaded with suture washers (∗), which contain a permanent, high-tensile suture. This suture will allow for soft tissue to be attached directly to the graft without the need of additional holes/anchors to be placed.

      Capsule and Subscapularis Repair

      With the arm placed approximately at 45° of external rotation, the capsule is repaired using #2 FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL) suture preloaded on the suture washers. The remaining stump of the coracoacromial ligament is incorporated in the capsule repair. Using a SutureTape (Arthrex), the subscapularis is then repaired carefully to avoid incarceration of the long head of the biceps at the lateral aspect of the repair. After completion of the repair of the capsule and the subscapularis, the conjoined tendon will be found medially exiting between the superior and inferior split of the subscapularis tendon (Fig 8).
      Figure thumbnail gr8
      Fig 8(A) A illustrative representation of the right shoulder anatomy following a coracoid transfer through subscapularis split for a postage stamp fracture, viewed from anterior. The subscapularis tendon (S) is split at the 60/40 interval to the level of the glenoid (solid black line). The conjoined tendon (C), attached to the coracoid, is then transferred through the split so that the tendon acts as a sling over top of the inferior subscapularis. (B) The completed sling construct of a right shoulder, viewed from anterior, following coracoid transfer for anterior instability due to a postage stamp fracture. The subscapularis tendon is outlined in blue, and conjoined tendon (outlined in yellow) can be seen traversing superficial to the inferior subscapularis before diving deep to the superior subscapularis and inserting onto the coracoid which is now secured to the anterior glenoid. This repair construct provides increased glenohumeral stability through the dynamic stabilization offered by the conjoined tendon and inferior subscapularis.

      Closure and Postoperative Plan

      At this point, the wound is closed per surgeon preference. Postoperatively, we place the operative arm into a padded abduction sling for 6 weeks. External rotation is restricted to 30° for the first 3 weeks. The full rehabilitation protocol is outlined in Table 2.
      Table 2Rehabilitation Protocol for Patients Following Open Latarjet Procedure for Postage Stamp Fracture Instability
      Phase 1 (Surgery to 6 weeks Postsurgery)
       AppointmentPostoperative appointment 10-14 days
       Rehab goalsProtect the shoulder postoperatively
      Restore passive range of motion (ROM), 120° of forward flexion and 60° of external rotation
       PrecautionsSling for 6 weeks
      ROM restrictions
       0-3 weeks
      External rotation (ER): 30
      Forward flexion (FF): 100
      Internal rotation (IR): Full as tolerated
      Abduction (ABD): Full as tolerated
       >3-6 weeks
      ER: 60
      FF: 120
      IR: Full as tolerated
      ABD: Full as tolerated
       Suggested therapeutic exercisesWeeks 1-6
       Cervical ROM exercises
       Elbow/hand/wrist ROM
       Ball squeezes
       Ankle pumps
       Scapular retraction and depression
      Weeks 3-6
       Pendulums
       Aquatherapy for active assist range of motion (AAROM)
       Progression criteria Full passive range of motion (PROM)
      Phase 2 (6 weeks-13)
       Appointment
       Rehab goalsFull active range of motion (AROM)
      Strengthen shoulder in protected positions
      Begin restoring neuromuscular control
       PrecautionsNo AROM until week 7
      No low load prolonged stretching until week 8
       Suggested therapeutic exercisesWeeks 6-9
       AAROM IR, ER, flexion, extension, abduction
       Isometrics IR, ER, flexion, extension, abduction
      Weeks 7-13
       AROM
      Bench press series
      Modified military press
      Side-lying ER
      Salutes
      Full can
      Prone row
      Weeks 8-13
       AROM
      Prone Ys
       Low-load prolonged stretching
      Towel IR
      Cross arm stretch
      Sleeper stretch
      Weeks 9-13
       Initial resistance strengthening
      IR/ER
      Double-arm ER
      Full can
      Forward punch +
      Rows
      Bicep curls
      Triceps extensions
      Lat pull downs
       Activities of daily livingFull use of arm
      Eating/drinking
      Dressing
      Washing/showering
       Progression criteriaFull AROM
      Negative apprehension and impingement
      Good muscle contraction
      Phase 3 (weeks 13-16)
       Activities of daily living (ADLs)No limitations in ADLs at this point
       Progression criteriaStrength is 4/5 when compared bilaterally,
      Full pain-free ROM
      Phase 4 (weeks 16-25)
       Appointment
       Rehab goalsRestore full strength (5/5) with all planes
      Stability with high velocity plyometrics
      Full pain-free ROM
       PrecautionsDeceleration movements until week 21
       Suggested therapeutic exercisesContinued strengthening- 25
       Bear hugs
       ER @ 45 & @ 90
       Rhythmic stabilization
      17-25
       Plyometrics
       Advanced closed-chain stability
      21-25
       Decelerations
      Progression criteria
      Pain free ROM
      Maximized strength
      Proper scapulothoracic movement
      No apprehension to return to activity
      Phase 5 (week 25+)
       Rehab goalsProgress to full activity
      Work capacity of cardiovascular endurance for specific sports demands
       PrecautionsGradually build into sport-specific demands

      Discussion

      Variability in treatment for patients with recurrent anterior instability from a postage stamp fracture exists. We recommend the use of a bony stabilization procedure over fragment reduction and fixation or other soft-tissue/arthroscopic procedures. In our opinion, previous anchor placement disrupts normal glenoid anatomy and changes the biomechanical properties of the anterior glenoid bone. In addition, unless a fixation procedure can be performed immediately, often the delay in surgical intervention causes the bony fragment to lose its structural integrity. Even in settings in which a postage stamp fracture can be surgically addressed immediately, we are concerned that additional fixation placed through the already compromised fragment will place a high risk of recurrent fracture on the repair.
      When evaluating the shoulder during the EUA and arthroscopic procedure, concurrent intra-articular pathology should be carefully examined. If a large Hill–Sachs defect exists, consideration should be given for additional posterior stabilization. In the rare case that posterior labral tears occur simultaneously with anterior instability events and postage stamp fractures, the sequence of fixation should prevent damage to areas following repair. We prefer performing the coracoid transfer and finishing with arthroscopic posterior labral repair; Fukuda placement during coracoid transfer would place a high amount of stress on the posterior labrum and risk damage to repair site. In addition, patients who have been immobilized for a longer period of time before surgical stabilization may require selective soft-tissue releases.
      Although there are many variants in technique for performing a coracoid transfer, our preference is to split the subscapularis and capsule in line with one another. This ensures that we have access to the anterior glenoid without risk of overly medializing/lateralizing the capsular split. In addition, the split allows the coracoid to be repaired to the anterior glenoid with the conjoined tendon functioning as a sling to the inferior subscapularis, providing a dynamic stabilization effect. A longitudinal split allows a capsular repair to be performed directly to the subscapularis and allows medialization of the repair to the level of the coracoid. A full list of pearls and pitfalls for this surgical technique are outlined in Table 3.
      Table 3Pearls and Pitfalls of the Latarjet Procedure for Restoring Glenohumeral Stability in a Patient With a Postage Stamp Fracture
      TechniquePearlsPitfalls
      Examination under anesthesiaNote if shoulder is sitting in a dislocated position at rest

      Note position of maximum instability
      Failure to note position of maximum instability may result in coracoid positioning at improper location on glenoid
      Diagnostic arthroscopy and debridementComplete diagnostic arthroscopy should evaluate for concurrent pathology such as labral tear, capsular avulsion, rotator cuff tear, and quality of glenoid boneIf posterior labral repair is performed at time of arthroscopy, there is risk of damage to this repair during retractor placement for open portion of surgical procedure
      Coracoid harvest and preparationLeave 1-cm cuff of coracoacromial ligament attached to coracoid—this will be incorporated into capsular repair at end of surgery

      A 90° sagittal saw blade is often approximately 25 mm from blade bend to the saw handle. This can help with visualizing appropriate depth of resection

      The trapezoid component of the coracoclavicular ligament is, on average, 2-3 mm closer to the tip of the coracoid than the elbow of the coracoid
      • Shibata T.
      • Izaki T.
      • Miyake S.
      • et al.
      Predictors of safety margin for coracoid transfer: A cadaveric morphometric analysis.
      Positioning the curved osteotomy so that the blade angles towards the scapula may result in propagation of fracture from coracoid base into scapular body

      Failure to release musculocutaneous nerve adhesions, or pulling coracoid out of the incision during drilling may result in undue traction and nerve paralysis

      Skeletonizing the superior coracoid all the way to the elbow will destabilize the coracoclavicular ligamentous complex
      Glenoid exposure and preparationA K-wire may be placed into the scapula to retract the superior subscapularis

      Ensure that medial exposure will allow for appropriate drilling trajectory—often the surgeon's hand will need to be medial to the incision with a medial to lateral instrument trajectory
      Prolonged medial retraction may increase risk of nerve palsy or injury

      Splitting the subscapularis too superiorly (i.e. at the mid-point) will make accessing the inferior glenoid difficult. The subscapularis split should be through the inferior half of the subscapularis; we recommend a 60/40 split.
      Coracoid transferTwo K-wires can be used to fix the coracoid in place and allow access to both screw holes simultaneously

      Screw purchase should be the priority with coracoid transfer. If the coracoid is slightly proud, we recommend using a burr to contour the lateral coracoid after fixation rather than removing the screw and adjusting, which would risk losing fixation.
      Placing K-wires through the predrilled holes on the coracoid to provisionally fix the graft will allow significant toggling of the coracoid and lead to difficulty with screw insertion

      Positioning the coracoid too superior on the glenoid, which is often easier to access, will lead to inadequate restoration of the glenoid surface area.
      Capsule and subscapularis repairPreloaded washers with a permanent, high-tensile suture can be used to improve compression of the coracoid and allow for soft tissue to be repaired directly to the coracoid.Repairing the subscapularis with the arm in internal rotation will lead to reduced length of subscapularis side to side repair, increasing risk of failure
      In cases in which the labrum is intact and nondegenerative, even in chronic fractures, the surgeon may consider retention of the labrum and repair of the labrum directly to the coracoid after transfer. This may improve stability, but does increase the risk of fracture of the coracoid given additional anchor placement in the coracoid.
      In the setting of a postage stamp fracture and recurrent glenohumeral instability, we believe that this technique offers a reliable, reproducible, and highly effective surgical solution that will maximize patient outcomes while minimizing risk of recurrent instability and future surgery.

      Supplementary Data

      References

        • Provencher M.T.
        • Sanchez A.
        • Sanchez G.
        • et al.
        Shoulder and elbow injuries in athletes: Prevention, treatment and return to sport.
        Ed 1. Elsevier, Philadelphia2017: 31-38
        • Woolnough T.
        • Shah A.
        • Sheean A.J.
        • Lesniak B.P.
        • Wong I.
        • Sa D.
        “Postage stamp” fractures: A systematic review of patient and suture anchor profiles causing anterior glenoid rim fractures after Bankart repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 2501-2508.e2
        • Itoi E.
        • Lee S.B.
        • Berglund L.J.
        • Berge L.L.
        • An K.N.
        The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: A cadaveric study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 35-46
        • Yamamoto N.
        • Muraki T.
        • Sperling J.W.
        Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 2059-2066
        • Shaha J.S.
        • Cook J.B.
        • Song D.J.
        Redefining “critical” bone loss in shoulder instability: Functional outcomes worsen with “subcritical” bone loss.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1719-1725
        • Domos P.
        • Lunini E.
        • Walch G.
        Contraindications and complications of the Latarjet procedure.
        Shoulder Elbow. 2018; 10: 15-24
        • Shibata T.
        • Izaki T.
        • Miyake S.
        • et al.
        Predictors of safety margin for coracoid transfer: A cadaveric morphometric analysis.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14: 174